ReviewFrontiers in surgery2026
Sudden sensorineural olfactory loss: a structured narrative review and proposal for a standardised terminological framework.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sudden loss of smell - particularly when sensorineural in origin - is a clinically disabling condition that the medical community has never adequately named. Patients presenting with acute olfactory loss encounter a field without shared definitions, dedicated ICD codes, or guidelines built around their specific presentation. The consequence is diagnostic delay, terminological inconsistency in the literature, and a research base that cannot be meaningfully synthesised. Objective: This paper reviews the evidence on sudden sensorineural olfactory loss, demonstrates that existing terminology is inadequate, and proposes a single new clinical term: Sudden Sensorineural Olfactory Loss (SSNOL). Two descriptive aetiological categories are introduced solely to guide future research, not as additional terminology. Methods: A structured narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases. Studies were selected based on relevance to sudden olfactory dysfunction, neural pathway mechanisms, diagnostic imaging, and clinical management. Both primary research articles and systematic reviews published between 2000 and 2024 were considered. Results: The evidence describes a condition with serious, sometimes permanent neural consequences. Post-viral olfactory loss - which received relatively limited specialist attention before the COVID-19 pandemic - was suddenly experienced by hundreds of millions of people, exposing how poorly the field was equipped to respond. Diagnostic tools are blunt. Treatment options are thin. Olfactory training is the only intervention with consistent evidence behind it. None of this will improve without better terminology to organise research around. Conclusion: We propose the term "Sudden Sensorineural Olfactory Loss" (SSNOL) as the sole terminological contribution of this paper, modelled on the established precedent of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). To guide future research, two descriptive aetiological categories are described - SSNOL-Viral and SSNOL-Idiopathic - presented as hypothesis-generating models to support future research design. Traumatic olfactory loss is explicitly excluded from the SSNOL definition and should be managed under existing post-traumatic frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.