ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Prognostic nutritional index as a predictor of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Anastomotic leakage remains a major complication following rectal cancer surgery. Neoadjuvant therapy, while improving oncological outcomes, may negatively impact nutritional and immunological status. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) for anastomotic leakage in locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 123 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by curative resection with primary anastomosis between 2018 and 2024. PNI was calculated using preoperative serum albumin and lymphocyte count. ROC curve analysis determined the optimal PNI cutoff value. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified independent predictors of anastomotic leakage. Results: Anastomotic leakage occurred in 19 patients (15.4%). The optimal PNI cutoff was 51.25 (AUC = 0.756, sensitivity 78.9%, specificity 67.3%). In multivariate analysis, PNI was an independent predictor of anastomotic leakage (OR = 0.809, 95% CI: 0.696-0.941, Conclusions: Preoperative PNI is an independent predictor of anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant therapy. PNI may serve as a practical tool for preoperative risk stratification and guide clinical decision-making regarding nutritional optimization and surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.