ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Clinical outcomes and radiologic parameters of percutaneous endoscopic posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using rammed-earth technique.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To assess the clinical effectiveness of employing rammed-earth technique in bone grafting during percutaneous endoscopic posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PE-P/TLIF) in treating lumbar degenerative diseases. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed patients who underwent PE-P/TLIF for lumbar degenerative diseases from December 2019 to August 2023. The study included 22 patients treated with the rammed-earth technique and 21 patients treated without the rammed-earth technique. Surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and the number of surgical segments were compared between the two groups. Pain and neurological function were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) lumbar score. Radiographic measurements, including lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, intervertebral height, and cage subsidence depth. Results: Both groups showed varying degrees of reduction in VAS and ODI scores from preoperative levels on the first postoperative day and at the final follow-up, while the JOA scores increased significantly. At the final follow-up, the rammed group had higher JOA ratings than the umrammed group. ( Conclusion: Using the rammed-earth technique in PE-P/TLIF procedures can securely reduce the rate and depth of cage subsidence, improving lumbar spine function after a follow-up period of at least six months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.