ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Case Report: Multidisciplinary collaboration for the treatment of severe necrotizing fasciitis in the perineum caused by rectal cancer perforation.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fournier's gangrene (FG) is a rare but life-threatening necrotizing fasciitis of the perineum and genital regions. Rectal cancer perforation is an uncommon cause of FG, and optimal management remains challenging. Case presentation: We report a 62-year-old male with rectal cancer complicated by severe FG secondary to rectal perforation. The patient underwent emergency fecal diversion, repeated extensive perineal debridement combined with vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy, and intensive supportive care. Following infection control and clinical stabilization, definitive surgical management was performed, including laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection and reconstruction of the large perineal defect using a vascularized gracilis muscle flap and a gluteus maximus fascia composite flap. At two-month follow-up, the patient demonstrated complete wound healing, stable colostomy function, and recovery of independent daily activities. Conclusions: This case highlights the complexity of managing FG associated with rectal cancer perforation and demonstrates the feasibility of sequential treatment strategies integrating infection control, oncologic resection, and reconstructive surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.