ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Development and validation of the C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index for predicting short- and long-term mortality in critically ill patients with coronary artery disease: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whose Signal Is It Anyway? The C-Reactive Protein-Triglyceride-Glucose Index in Hyperlipidemic Acute Pancreatitis.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- The association between C-reactive protein-triglyceride glucose index and all-cause mortality in patients with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The C-reactive protein-triglyceride glucose index (CTI) has been proposed as a novel biomarker of insulin resistance and inflammation, but its association with mortality in critically ill patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between the CTI and both short- and long-term all-cause mortality and to assess the predictive value of this index. Methods: Patients with CAD were identified from the MIMIC-IV database and divided into internal training and testing cohorts, while an external validation cohort was derived from the eICU-CRD and Shenzhen Regional Health Information Platform (SRHIP) database. Based on the optimal CTI cut-off values, patients were grouped into three categories. The primary outcomes were short-term (30-day) and long-term (365-day) all-cause mortality. Associations between the CTI and mortality were examined using Kaplan-Meier curves, restricted cubic spline regression, and Cox proportional hazards models. Subgroup, mediation and sensitivity analyses tested result robustness. The CTI was further compared with other single predictors, and six machine learning (ML) models were built to assess its predictive performance. Finally, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified feature contributions, and a user-friendly web application was developed. Results: The primary cohort included 1,561 patients, and two external validation cohorts included 242 and 105 patients from the eICU-CRD and SRHIP databases. High CTI values were significantly associated with increased short- and long-term mortality, demonstrating a nonlinear dose-response relationship. The CTI exhibited particularly high predictive value for short-term outcomes. The incorporation of the CTI into ML models notably improved the predictive performance, and this improvement was confirmed in the external validation cohort. Conclusions: The CTI was identified as an independent predictor of short- and long-term mortality in critically ill patients with CAD, with a particularly high predictive value for short-term risk stratification. Integrating the CTI into predictive models significantly increased the prognostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.