ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Preliminary volume-based optimization of radioactive iodine dose without radioactive iodine uptake in Graves' disease.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Optimal radioactive iodine (RAI) dosing for Graves' disease remains controversial. Conventional calculated regimens require radioactive iodine uptake (RAIU) testing, whereas empiric fixed-dose strategies risk under- or overtreatment. Although activity per gram of thyroid tissue provides an uptake-independent approach, volume-specific minimum effective doses and functional outcomes remain insufficiently defined. This study aimed to determine the minimum RAI activity per gram required to achieve ≥75% remission across stratified thyroid volumes, to identify the activity associated with the highest euthyroid remission, and to evaluate whether dose escalation increases treatment-related adverse events. Methods: This retrospective study included 236 patients with Graves' disease who received initial single-dose RAI therapy between August 2022 and August 2024 at a tertiary center in Thailand. Thyroid volume by ultrasonography was categorized as <25 g, 25-49.9 g, 50-74.9 g, and ≥75 g. Administered activity was grouped as <0.30, 0.30-0.39, 0.40-0.49, 0.50-0.59, and ≥0.60 mCi/g. Outcomes and adverse events were assessed at 6 months. Result: The minimum activity required to achieve ≥75% remission increased with thyroid volume: 0.30-0.39 mCi/g for <25 g glands (90%), 0.40-0.49 mCi/g for 25-49.9 g (77%), and 0.50-0.59 mCi/g for 50-74.9 g (100%). No activity achieved ≥75% remission in glands ≥75 g, with a maximum rate of 45%. Across all volumes, the highest euthyroid rates occurred at the lowest effective activity, whereas dose escalation increased hypothyroidism without improving overall remission. Adverse events were infrequent (5.5-7.6%) and mostly mild. Moderate neck pain was more frequent at higher activities, with a strong positive correlation between administered activity and total adverse events (r = 0.82, p = 0.089). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that volume-stratified radioiodine dosing offers an effective and practical alternative to traditional 24-hour RAIU-based dosimetry for Graves' disease. Adjusting activity according to thyroid volume yields predictable remission while avoiding the logistical burdens of uptake testing. The dose-response relationship also underscores the need to balance efficacy with avoidance of excess toxicity. Overall, this individualized, volume-based strategy provides a scalable and efficient framework for optimizing radioiodine therapy, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.