ArticleIndian journal of psychological medicine2026
Integrating Lived Experience Perspectives in AI-based Mental Health Research: A Practice-based Reflective Account.
Article in Indian journal of psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The embedding of lived experience experts (LEEs) is increasingly recognized as important in research, but evidence from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) remains sparse. This viewpoint aims to present and critically reflect on a model for integrating LEEs into the design of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based mental health (MH) study to develop an automated depression screening system in India. We report on the process of forming a diverse Lived Experience Advisory Panel (LEAP) and show how LEAP influenced methodology, system design, ethics, and language through a three-day workshop and co-design sessions. We also highlight the ethical, structural, and power-dynamic challenges encountered, demonstrating that meaningful LEE partnership is both feasible and essential for developing culturally grounded, safe, and clinically acceptable AI applications in LMIC settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.