ArticleMedicine international
Management of post-cesarean pelvic abscess in the uterine scar: A case report and mini-review of the literature.
Article in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cesarean section is among the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide. In recent years, the increasing rate of cesarean deliveries has led to an increased incidence of post-operative complications. The present case report describes a rare case of a post-operative pelvic abscess located at the uterine scar following a cesarean section, managed successfully via laparotomy. The patient, a 17-year-old woman, was admitted 1 week after undergoing a cesarean delivery. She presented with abdominal pain, fever and chills. Blood tests revealed elevated inflammatory markers and a mild coagulation disorder, consistent with an ongoing infectious process. The results of urinalysis did not reveal any notable findings. A transvaginal ultrasound and an abdominal computed tomography scan revealed a large, mixed echogenic mass with irregular borders and the presence of intralesional air bubbles, localized at the uterine scar anterior to the bladder. Given the persistence of clinical symptoms, supportive imaging and laboratory findings, and the failure of conservative management of the post-operative intra-abdominal infection, surgical intervention was deemed necessary. A laparotomy was performed through the previous cesarean incision. Intraoperatively, an abscess was identified at the site of the uterine scar and was surgically drained. Samples were collected for aerobic and anaerobic cultures, and the cavity was irrigated thoroughly to remove purulent and hemorrhagic material. A drainage tube was placed before closure. The postoperative course of the patient was uneventful, with complete clinical resolution. Following the case presentation, a brief review of the current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for this uncommon post-operative complication is also provided. On the whole, the present case report underscores the importance of timely surgical intervention via laparotomy when image-guided drainage or laparoscopy is not feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.