Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221988›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2026

Comparative effects of deep-frying and non-fat reheating on characteristic volatile organic compounds and quality of crispy fried pork.

Chunyuan Ping, Qin Ding, Rongying Pan, Yuwei Zhao, Junjie Gong, Jihong Wu, Xiaojun Liao, Fei Lao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chunyuan PingCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Qin DingCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Rongying PanCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Yuwei ZhaoShandong Longda Meishi Co., Ltd., Laiyang 265200, China.
Junjie GongShandong Longda Meishi Co., Ltd., Laiyang 265200, China.
Jihong WuCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Xiaojun LiaoCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Fei LaoCollege of Food Science and Nutritional Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep-frying reheating brings the signature crispy texture of crispy fried pork (CFP), but additional oil absorption raises concerns for health-conscious consumers. This study compared deep-frying (DF) with non-fat reheating methods, including air-frying (AF), oven reheating (OV) and microwave reheating (MW), and evaluated their effects on the nutrition, lipid oxidation, protein degradation, texture, color and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of CFP. The optimal reheating conditions were DF (185 °C/2 min), AF (185 °C/12 min), MW (500 W/7 min), and OV (200 °C) based on tenderness and color. AF achieved 15.4 % fat reduction compared to DF while maintaining similar textural properties, MW and OV substantially increased hardness, likely compromising consumer acceptability. HS-SPME-GC-MS identified 20 VOCs with six key compounds dominated by terpenes. AF preserved terpenes more effectively than DF, contributing citrus, herbal, and pine aromas to CFP. This study provides valuable scientific insights to non-fat alternative reheating methods for CFP.

Indexed as

Crispy fried porkFlavorHS-SPME-GC–MSMultivariate statisticsNon-fat reheating

Identifiers

PMID42221988
PMCPMC13216731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.