Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221964›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

Coping in crisis: a qualitative study of stress and resilience in Ontario's long-term care workforce.

Sheila A Boamah, Farzana Akter, Mawukoenya Theresa Sedzro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sheila A BoamahSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Farzana AkterSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Mawukoenya Theresa SedzroFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The global long-term care (LTC) sector is increasingly strained by entrenched structural vulnerabilities, including persistent workforce shortages, constrained resources, high resident-to-staff ratios, and rising clinical complexity, all of which compromise the delivery of safe, high-quality care. In Canada, these challenges are particularly acute, placing substantial psychological, emotional, and ethical strain on LTC workers. Despite this, empirical insight into their lived experiences, particularly within Ontario remains limited. Objective: This study explores the lived experiences of LTC staff and leaders in Ontario, Canada, examining work-related stressors and coping strategies across the acute and post-acute phases of the COVID-19 pandemic through the lens of Lazarus and Folkman's (2008) Transactional Model of Stress and Coping to inform interventions that support workforce well-being and strengthen care delivery. Methods: A qualitative co-design approach was employed using purposive and convenience sampling. Twenty-four LTC staff, including personal support workers, registered nurses, and administrators, participated in eleven focus group discussions. Guided by Experience-Based Co-Design (EBCD) principles, participants were engaged as co-researchers, contributing as collaborative partners in identifying emotionally salient "touchpoints" and jointly reflecting on workplace stressors and coping strategies. Data were thematically analyzed and subsequently mapped onto the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping, including problem-focused, emotion-focused, and meaning-focused coping strategies. Results: Five themes were identified, each reflecting an emotionally salient touchpoint and its corresponding coping response: (i) Discussion: This study illuminates how LTC workers navigate emotionally salient touchpoints and systemic constraints while sustaining compassionate care through coping processes that are relational, co-constructed, and shaped by supportive interpersonal and organizational contexts. By integrating the Transactional Model with EBCD, it advances methodological and theoretical understanding of coping as a dynamic, context-embedded process rather than an individual response. These insights offer actionable directions for strengthening workforce resilience, enhancing organizational supports, and informing more responsive and relationship-centred models of care within LTC.

Indexed as

Canadaco-designcoping strategieshealth care workforcelong-term careresiliencestress

Identifiers

PMID42221964
PMCPMC13217439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.