Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221933›Full record

ArticleACS physical chemistry Au2026

A Tutorial on Mechanistic Modeling of Nonstatistical Reactivity: Example of Light and Heat Effects in the Garratt-Braverman/[1,5]‑H Shift of Ene-diallenes.

Tomislav Rožić, Yuxuan Hou, Lea K Northcote, Christian Marcus Pedersen, Gemma C Solomon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS physical chemistry Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tomislav RožićDepartment of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7591-1624
Yuxuan HouDepartment of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lea K NorthcoteDepartment of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4256-1856
Christian Marcus PedersenDepartment of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4661-4895
Gemma C SolomonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2018-1529

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Broad terms in the literature, such as nonstatistical reactivity or nontraditional luminescence, emerge when standard theories fail to explain experimental results. In the case of nonstatistical and dynamic effects, reaction rates and product ratios may vary wildly from transition state theory (TST) predictions and are commonly accompanied by a lack of temperature dependence. In this Tutorial, we explain how to use modern and freely available computational chemistry tools to model apparently nonstatistical reactions in relatively large organic molecules, using a concrete example of the thermal Garratt-Braverman/[1,5]-H shift of an ene-diallene, such that a non-expert can easily replicate our approach by following our steps. As a team of synthetic organic chemists and computational chemists, we aim to promote the use of preparatory computational work that can aid in reaction design during the experimental process rather than merely serving as complementary data to finished experimental studies. For this reason, we also offer an overview of the literature leading into more advanced computational techniques. Working through the example of the thermal Garratt-Braverman/[1,5]-H shift, we illustrate how theory and experiment can be used together to investigate the possibility of parallel light-enabled reactions and the role of tunneling effects and to perform careful variable temperature analysis when it becomes necessary. As the motifs of reactive π-π* absorptions, hydrogen transfers, and diradical intermediates are quite common, the points presented in this Tutorial are broadly applicable and indicative of the underlying complexity behind many chemical reactions that exhibit unexpected rates and ratios. The failure of TST also underscores a critical limitation of massive reaction network discovery schemes that heavily rely on calculated ground-state activation energies as well as the potential pitfalls of the conventional free energy diagram mindset.

Indexed as

computational chemistryhydrogen transfermolecular modelingnonstatistical effectsnonstatistical reactivityphotochemical activationreaction mechanismstransition state theory

Identifiers

PMID42221933
PMCPMC13220210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.