ArticleACS physical chemistry Au2026
Atomistic Simulation of Collapse and Recrystallization in Hollow Gold and Silver Nanoparticles with Ultrathin, Porous Walls.
Article in ACS physical chemistry Au, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the thermal stability of hollow metal nanoframes remains a significant challenge due to strongly coupled effects such as porosity, curvature, and defect migration. Using tight-binding Monte Carlo simulations, we systematically investigate gold and silver nanoframes with cavity radii of 7.0-19.9 Å and quantitatively resolve their structural evolution through a shape-parametrization method that tracks cavity collapse and global flattening with ångström-level precision. Silver nanoframes exhibit lateral pore closure at 605-785 K, cavity collapse at 783-844 K, and melting near 852-900 K. Gold analogues show earlier pore closure (585-720 K) but higher collapse temperatures (688-823 K) and melting at 772-825 K, consistent with more coordinated recrystallization. The flattening parameter rises to 0.18-0.22 before global deformation, serving as a universal geometric indicator. Together, these quantitative criteria advance mechanistic understanding and enable the predictive design of thermally robust porous metal nanostructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.