Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221898›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Biocontrol of

Mohamed Matared, Imke Hutter, Katja Burow, Philipp Franken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohamed MataredINOQ GmbH, Schnega, Germany.
Imke HutterINOQ GmbH, Schnega, Germany.
Katja BurowInstitute of Microbiology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Philipp FrankenInstitute of Microbiology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) are increasingly recognized for their capacity to enhance plant growth and, in some cases, to induce systemic resistance against phytopathogens, though the extent and specificity of this protection remain strain- and pathosystem-dependent. This study investigates the biocontrol potential of two endophytic PGPB strains, Methods: We tested both strains for their antagonistic potential in dual culture and two-compartment Petri plates todetermine their direct antifungal capacity under controlled conditions. After this, tomato plants were pre-inoculated with each PGPB and challenged with Results: The results showed that Discussion: These findings indicate that

Indexed as

biocontrolBotrytis cinereaFusarium oxysporuminducing resistanceKosakonia radicincitansParaburkholderia phytofirmansPGPBpriming

Identifiers

PMID42221898
PMCPMC13216485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.