ArticleJuntendo medical journal2026
Adaptation of the Compliance with Standard Precautions Scale for Nurses in Clinical Settings (Japanese Version): A Two-Phase Methodological Study.
Article in Juntendo medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To translate and adapt the Compliance with Standard Precautions Scale (CSPS) into Japanese and validate it among Japanese nurses. Materials and Methods: This was a two-phase study. First, we translated the original English CSPS into Japanese. The content validity index of the result was evaluated by experts, whereas the linguistic validity was ascertained by clinical nurses, from which we generated the CSPS-Japanese version. Second, the reliability and validity of the CSPS-Japanese version were evaluated using cross-sectional data from 248 nurses. Reliability was assessed using internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and the 2-week test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient). Construct validity was established using confirmatory factors and Rasch analysis. Differences in self-reported compliance based on training experience were examined. Results: The CSPS-Japanese version showed satisfactory reliability. The constructed model showed an acceptable fit index. Nurses with training experience had higher self-reported compliance. Conclusions: The CSPS-Japanese version showed good reliability and validity, and this indicates that the tool constitutes an appropriate new self-administered evaluation method for Japanese nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.