Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221870›Full record

ArticleStatistics in biosciences2025

Variance Estimation for Weighted Average Treatment Effects.

Huiyue Li, Yi Liu, Yunji Zhou, Jiajun Liu, Dezhao Fu, Roland A Matsouaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in biosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Huiyue LiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Yi LiuDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Yunji ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jiajun LiuDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Dezhao FuDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Roland A MatsouakaDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0271-5400

Funding

Integrated Biostatistical Training for CVD ResearchT32HL079896 · NHLBI · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Sean M O'Brien, Ana-Maria Staicu · 2006 to 2026
$4.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL079896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common variance estimation methods for weighted average treatment effects (WATEs) in observational studies include nonparametric bootstrap and model-based, closed-form sandwich variance estimation. However, the computational cost of bootstrap increases with the size of the data at hand. Besides, some replicates may exhibit random violations of the positivity assumption even when the original data do not. Sandwich variance estimation relies on regularity conditions that may be structurally violated. Moreover, the sandwich variance estimation is model-dependent on the propensity score model, the outcome model, or both; thus it does not have a unified closed-form expression. Recent studies have explored the use of wild bootstrap to estimate the variance of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). This technique adopts a one-dimensional, nonparametric, and computationally efficient resampling strategy. In this article, we propose a "post-weighting" bootstrap approach as an alternative to the conventional bootstrap, which helps avoid random positivity violations in replicates and improves computational efficiency. We also generalize the wild bootstrap algorithm from ATT to the broader class of WATEs by providing new justification for correctly accounting for sampling variability from multiple sources under different weighting functions. We evaluate the performance of all four methods through extensive simulation studies and demonstrate their application using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Our findings offer several practical recommendations for the variance estimation of WATE estimators.

Indexed as

Augmented estimatorInfluence functionPositivityPost-weighting bootstrapSandwich variance estimationStandard bootstrapWeighted average treatment effectWild bootstrap

Identifiers

PMID42221870
PMCPMC13220987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.