Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221866›Full record

ArticleAlterNative (Auckland, N.Z. : 2005)2026

Tłı̨chǫ nàowoò hoghàseètǫǫ: learning a strong like two research methodology through the exploration of community-centered curation practices.

Rebecca L Bourgeois

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AlterNative (Auckland, N.Z. : 2005), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rebecca L BourgeoisDepartment of Anthropology, Western University.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5635-2326

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collaborative research is rooted in the fundamental principle of recognizing communities as equal research partners. This article draws attention to an important part of this relationship-learning the traditional values of community and emulating these in research-presenting a reflection on the lessons learned during a three-year project to redefine principles of curation according to Tłı̨chǫ traditions for caring for knowledge. Throughout this process, Tłı̨chǫ Elders offered teachings that reached beyond cultural heritage into lessons on life, humility, and collaboration. Derived from the relationship between Tłı̨chǫ nàowoò (Tłı̨chǫ traditional knowledge, language, culture, and way of life), caribou, and building fires, a strong like two research methodology embodies the role of different perspectives in forming one strong voice. It draws from the Tłı̨chǫ teaching that encourages learning from multiple perspectives to be strong like two people and is the result of the missteps and mentorship experienced throughout our research.

Indexed as

anthropological methodscollectionscommunity-driven researchethnographymuseumsTłı̨chǫ

Identifiers

PMID42221866
PMCPMC13218597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.