ArticleTransportation research interdisciplinary perspectives2026
Exploring the relationship between traffic, speed, and personal in-vehicle noise exposure during commutes.
Article in Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While roadway noise is well-documented, research seldom quantifies the more critical in-vehicle exposure or evaluates the factors that modify it under real-world conditions. This study addresses this gap by investigating how traffic volume and driving speed, two key determinants in transportation planning, influence interior noise levels. Furthermore, we evaluate shifting commute times from rush hour to off-peak periods as a potential noise mitigation strategy. We collected 1-minute noise and GPS data from 148 vehicle trips taken by 14 participants in Hartford County, US. To evaluate how the departure time of morning commutes to work impacts noise exposure, we compared noise levels during a rush-hour commute (6:30-8:30 am) to a non-rush-hour commute for each participant. The median 1-minute noise level was 69.4 dBA (IQR = 65.7-74.1). Nine percent of measurements exceeded 80.0 dBA, the threshold of potential long-term hearing damage. Mixed-effects modeling showed both traffic volume and driving speed were positively associated with interior noise, with IQR increases linked to noise increases of 1.18 dBA and 0.71 dBA, respectively. However, substantial unexplained variability in the model suggests that other factors significantly influence noise levels more. The trip-averaged noise levels did not vary significantly between rush-hour (median = 70.7 dBA) and non-rush hour (median = 72.4 dBA) commutes (p = 0.84). This indicates that shifting commute times may not effectively mitigate overall noise exposure. Instead, strategies targeting overall traffic reduction may be more impactful. By linking vehicle interior noise to traffic characteristics and travel behavior, this study provides an interdisciplinary basis for transportation policies and traffic management reducing the environmental health burdens of commuting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.