ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Cost-effectiveness of 6-year school-based caries preventive interventions in Thailand: a system dynamics modeling study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of 6-year school-based caries preventive interventions [supervised toothbrushing (STB) and dental sealant] in Thailand using a System Dynamics Model (SDM). Methods: An SDM, which simulates changes in population health over time using stocks, flows, and feedback relationships, was developed to represent caries progression. In total, three scenarios were analyzed: STB, sealant, and a base case without intervention for 6 years, covering children aged 6-12 years. Costs included interventions and treatment (fillings, endodontic treatment, and extraction). Effectiveness was measured as the number of caries-free children. Model inputs were derived from national data, literature, and expert validation. Changes in outcomes and costs were driven by intervention effects. Results: Sealant had a lower cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) of 505.3 Thai baht (15.79 USD) per caries-free child versus 537.2 baht (16.79 USD) for STB. Both were more costly and more effective than the base case, with an incremental effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 1,985.3 baht (62.04 USD) for STB and 1,210.5 baht (37.83 USD) for sealant per additional caries-free child. Sealant was dominant over STB (negative ICER), meaning it was more effective and less costly. In best-case sensitivity scenarios, sealant was more effective but also more costly than STB, representing a trade-off, with an ICER of 121.54 baht (3.80 USD) per additional caries-free child. Conclusion: Sealant is the preferred strategy or a trade-off option when resources allow for additional caries-free children, while STB can serve as a low-cost alternative. Policy should prioritize sealant by optimizing effectiveness, controlling costs, and targeting high-risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.