ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Know Your Number; Control Your Number campaign: Nigeria.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Know Your Numbers; Control Your Numbers is a landmark nationwide health initiative designed to screen 10 million Nigerians for risk factors associated with non-communicable diseases (NCDs), particularly high blood pressure and high blood glucose, implemented across all 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory. Methods: This policy paper presents insights from screening 1,551,394 individuals. Blood pressure was measured using the WHO HEARTS threshold (≥140/90 mmHg), and blood glucose was assessed using random testing (≥200 mg/dL). Measurements represent single-point screening findings and are not diagnostic. Results: Overall, 12% of participants had high blood pressure and 22% had high blood glucose. Both indicators rose with age: high blood pressure from 3.7% (18-29 years) to 23% (50+ years); high blood glucose from 20% to 24%. Males had marginally higher blood pressure (13% vs 12%), while females had higher blood glucose (23% vs 20%). Substantial geographic variation was observed: the North-West recorded the highest high blood pressure (15%) and the South-East the highest high blood glucose (47%). State-level rates ranged from 6.6% (FCT) to 19% (Plateau) for blood pressure, and from 1.4% (Nasarawa) to 50% (Delta) for blood glucose. Discussion: These findings provide an unprecedented national snapshot of NCD risk patterns. Extreme geographic variations may reflect demographic, methodological, or contextual factors and warrant further investigation. The campaign reinforces the urgent need for sustained, standardized screening, stronger integration of primary health care, and data-driven approaches to NCD prevention and control in Nigeria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.