Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221651›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Proactive health intervention outcomes in older adults with diabetes patients: a scoping review.

Xinyi Jin, Yao Cheng, Yating Ai, Xiaohong Zhang

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinyi Jin *School of Nursing, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.
Yao Cheng *Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (The Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Hubei Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine), Wuhan, China.
Yating AiSchool of Nursing, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China.
Xiaohong ZhangHubei Shizhen Laboratory, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The phenomenon of global population ageing is driving a marked increase in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus among the older population, who face multiple health burdens requiring comprehensive management. Current models are limited by an inadequate focus on cultivating patients' self-management capacities. Therefore, the establishment of a scientifically rigorous, holistic, proactive health management system covering the full disease cycle that encompasses the entire range of care for the designated population is essential. This study employs a scoping review methodology in order to systematically map and synthesize domestic and international evidence on proactive health interventions for older patients suffering from diabetes. The objective of this study is to elucidate the various intervention types, the core outcome measures, and the overall effect trends. The objective of this study is to comprehensively map the extant evidence and identify pivotal components, with the aim of informing the future development and implementation of proactive health management models for this group. Methods: This study adheres to the Arksey and O'Malley framework for scoping reviews. Systematic searches were conducted across both Chinese and English databases, including CNKI, WanFang, CQVIP, CBM, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The search covered publications from January 2015 to October 2025. Two independent researchers screened and extracted the data. Results: The search yielded 813 publications, of which 24 studies were included in the final analysis: 10 in English and 14 in Chinese. The included studies consisted primarily of 15 randomized controlled trials, 2 qualitative studies, 4 quasi-experimental studies, along with 2 cohort studies and 1 pilot study. Proactive health interventions are now analyzed through a dual framework of core components: educational empowerment, and behavioral support. The core outcome measures focused on physiological indicators, such as glycated hemoglobin and fasting blood glucose; patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life and self-management capacity; and other health-related indicators, such as nutritional status and oral health. The literature includes research findings that indicate a positive trend across all measurement domains. Discussion: To optimize care for older adults with diabetes, implementation of adaptable proactive health management strategies is crucial. Evidence indicates that patient-centered models emphasizing active participation improve key outcomes like glycemic control, quality of life, and self-management. Their success depends on adaptability to resource levels and individual characteristics, supported by multidisciplinary teams delivering personalized, evidence-based plans. Further clinical translation requires expanded evidence from large-scale randomized controlled trials assessing long-term efficacy and applicability to older subgroups with comorbidities, alongside standardization of core elements under national or professional guidance to enhance system efficiency and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusOutcome Assessment, Health CareAgedHumansQuality of Lifediabeteshealth managementolder adultsproactive healthscoping review

Identifiers

PMID42221651
PMCPMC13217438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.