ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Scarcity by design: famine, structural violence, and the biosocial inheritance of political deprivation.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Famine is conventionally understood as a crisis of food supply, yet historical and contemporary evidence reveals it as a product of structural violence: political decisions, colonial extraction, and military force that manufacture scarcity and inscribe its consequences onto human bodies across generations. This conceptual analysis examines the intergenerational biology of famine through three cases: the 1944-45 Dutch Hunger Winter, colonial-era famines in India, and the ongoing famine in Gaza. Drawing on the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) paradigm, social medicine, and global health scholarship, we argue that famine's metabolic, immunological, and neurodevelopmental consequences are enabled not only by the severity and timing of caloric deprivation but by the political structures that determine whether deprivation is temporary or sustained, and whether recovery is supported or obstructed. The Dutch case affirms potent within-generation effects partially buffered by postwar welfare reconstruction; colonial India demonstrates how centuries of imperial extraction produced enduring, population-level metabolic vulnerability; and Gaza combines acute starvation with decades of siege, occupation, and infrastructural destruction. A biosocial framework resituates famine as both immediate violence and long-term biological imprinting, urging accountability beyond humanitarian logics of survival to encompass reparative justice, self-determination, and the dismantling of the political systems that produce manufactured hunger.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.