ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Research on influencing factors of public panic during infectious disease pandemics: a structural equation modeling study in five cities.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infectious diseases continue to pose a persistent threat to global public health, drawing greater focus to their transmission dynamics-especially the processes through which these dynamics induce public panic. While this aspect is vital to successful epidemic control, it has not been adequately theorized in prior research. To fill this gap, questionnaire data from 660 residents across five Chinese cities (Nanjing, Xuzhou, Suzhou, Shanghai, and Lianyungang) were examined via structural equation modeling (SEM) using IBM SPSS Amos 26.0. The analysis identified five key dimensions shaping public panic during respiratory infection outbreaks: personal characteristics, event perception, information spread, assessments of preventive interventions, and collective conduct. The measurement model demonstrated sound psychometric properties, with all factor loadings exceeding 0.50 and acceptable reliability (Cronbach's α ranging from 0.68 to 0.89). High loadings were observed for information transparency (0.794), government material allocation (0.854), and community prevention (0.834), indicating that these observed variables strongly represent their respective latent constructs. Event perception showed notable associations with information factors and government evaluations (correlations 0.70-0.77), highlighting the interconnected nature of these determinants. These results carry direct policy relevance. Upholding information accuracy, combating misinformation, and improving public grasp of disease transmission processes are theoretically and ethically sound strategies for curbing public panic, as they directly address the core constructs identified in the measurement model. Ensuring information transparency and delivering consistent risk communication can interrupt herd behavior cascades during health crises. The research offers practical guidance for establishing evidence-based emergency management procedures and public health preparedness frameworks, emphasizing the central role of these determinants in designing effective risk communication and emergency management policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.