ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Enrichment techniques for clinical metagenomics.
Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) offers a powerful, hypothesis-free approach for pathogen detection in clinical samples, allowing the identification of both known and novel microorganisms. However, the predominance of host nucleic acid in most samples poses a significant challenge, often overshadowing low-abundance pathogen sequences and increasing the cost of mNGS due to the high sequencing depth required. Enrichment techniques which selectively amplify pathogen-specific sequences can help to overcome this challenge, improving the sensitivity, specificity, and overall efficiency of mNGS - albeit while compromising the hypothesis-free nature and breadth of shotgun mNGS. As such, they can augment the use of mNGS in clinical scenarios where a more targeted approach is needed. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the main enrichment techniques currently employed in the field, including PCR-based enrichment, CRISPR-Cas9 enrichment, molecular inversion probes (MIP), nanopore adaptive sequencing (AS), and hybridisation capture-based methods. We evaluate each method on a range of metrics including methodology, cost, sensitivity, specificity, and ease of integration into clinical workflows, as well as describing their application to date for purposes including pathogen detection, antimicrobial resistance profiling, and whole-genome sequencing across diverse clinical sample types. Current limitations and future directions for refinement and implementation of these techniques are also discussed. By summarising the current landscape and latest advancements in mNGS enrichment strategies, this review aims to guide the optimisation of mNGS workflows in clinical diagnostics and highlight key areas for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.