ArticleGastroenterology report2026
Learning curve for endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy: a multicenter retrospective study with different levels of trainees.
Article in Gastroenterology report, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) is a minimally invasive treatment for appendicitis, widely practiced in China. Clarifying the learning curve, especially among endoscopists with varying endoscopic experience, including endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) skills, is essential for its broader adoption. This study aimed to determine the number of cases required to achieve procedural proficiency across different experience levels, as well as to examine the disparities in technical success rates and clinical outcomes. Methods: In this multicenter retrospective study, 655 consecutive patients who had undergone ERAT between October 2021 and March 2024 in The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Jingxing County Hospital, and The Affiliated Taian City Central Hospital of Qingdao University were analyzed. All ERAT procedures were performed by nine trainees from three hospitals, categorized into novice, non-ERCP experience, and ERCP experience groups. Outcomes included technical/clinical success, procedure time, pain, recurrence, length of stay, and adverse events. Learning curves were evaluated with cumulative sum (CUSUM) based on procedure time. Results: Technical and clinical outcomes improved with increasing experience in all groups. Proficiency occurred at the 31st case in the ERCP group, the 55th in the non‑ERCP group, and the 59th in novices. The ERCP group had the highest technical (99.1%) and clinical (94.4%) success ( Conclusions: Endoscopists with extensive prior endoscopic experience, particularly in ERCP, achieve proficiency in ERAT more rapidly. Structured training programs tailored to different experience levels are essential to support the safe and effective global implementation of ERAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.