Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221553›Full record

ArticleCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2026

Integration of Clinical Pharmacokinetic Database With Compartmental Modeling and Regulatory Data Analysis.

Oluwaseun E Agboola, Samuel S Agboola, Anuoluwapo Bukola Shaleye, Aniefon Samuel Umoekam, Zainab A Ayinla, Temitope Yinka Olasehinde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Oluwaseun E AgboolaInstitute for Drug Research and Development, Bogoro Research Centre, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti 360001, Nigeria.
Samuel S AgboolaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti 360001, Nigeria.
Anuoluwapo Bukola ShaleyeDepartment of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Afe Babalola University, AdoEkiti 360001, Nigeria.
Aniefon Samuel UmoekamDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Public Health, College of Pharmacy, Afe Babalola University.
Zainab A AyinlaDepartment of Biology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Temitope Yinka OlasehindeFederal Medical Centre, Makurdi, Benue State.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Computational pharmacokinetics increasingly relies on real-world clinical data rather than theoretical simulations. This study integrated authentic patient measurements from PK-DB clinical trials with FDA regulatory databases to characterize drug disposition patterns. Methods: Concentration-time profiles from 75 patients receiving caffeine (100-400 mg, n = 37) or paracetamol (500-1000 mg, n = 38) were analyzed using noncompartmental and one-compartment modeling approaches. FDA regulatory API queries provided contextual regulatory information. Parameters were estimated by a nonlinear least squares optimization of actual clinical measurements. Results: Caffeine exhibited dose-linear kinetics with apparent oral clearance of 2.96 L/h and a 4.0-hour elimination half-life. Paracetamol's elimination was faster (t½ 1.8 h) with an apparent oral clearance of 14.29 L/h. One-compartment models fit patient data excellently (R² > 0.98; AAFE 1.08-1.50 for all doses). The correlation between dose and AUC reached an impressive r = 0.9997 for caffeine, which was a confirmation of linear pharmacokinetics. The parameters derived from the models were in agreement with published population studies; thus, the approach was validated. Conclusions: The combination of curated clinical databases along with empirical compartmental modeling leads to the derivation of pharmacokinetically interpretable parameters that are based on actual measurements. This framework allows for evidence-based dose optimization and is applicable to more than 150 compounds in PK-DB, thus providing a significant advantage over simulation-dependent methodologies in translational pharmacometrics.

Indexed as

Clinical pharmacokineticsCompartmental modelingDose proportionalityPK-DB databaseReal-time data integration

Identifiers

PMID42221553
PMCPMC13218119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.