ArticleCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental2026
Integration of Clinical Pharmacokinetic Database With Compartmental Modeling and Regulatory Data Analysis.
Article in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- PlasmidRiskNet: An explainable machine-learning framework for antimicrobial resistance plasmid risk stratification.New microbes and new infections · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Computational pharmacokinetics increasingly relies on real-world clinical data rather than theoretical simulations. This study integrated authentic patient measurements from PK-DB clinical trials with FDA regulatory databases to characterize drug disposition patterns. Methods: Concentration-time profiles from 75 patients receiving caffeine (100-400 mg, n = 37) or paracetamol (500-1000 mg, n = 38) were analyzed using noncompartmental and one-compartment modeling approaches. FDA regulatory API queries provided contextual regulatory information. Parameters were estimated by a nonlinear least squares optimization of actual clinical measurements. Results: Caffeine exhibited dose-linear kinetics with apparent oral clearance of 2.96 L/h and a 4.0-hour elimination half-life. Paracetamol's elimination was faster (t½ 1.8 h) with an apparent oral clearance of 14.29 L/h. One-compartment models fit patient data excellently (R² > 0.98; AAFE 1.08-1.50 for all doses). The correlation between dose and AUC reached an impressive r = 0.9997 for caffeine, which was a confirmation of linear pharmacokinetics. The parameters derived from the models were in agreement with published population studies; thus, the approach was validated. Conclusions: The combination of curated clinical databases along with empirical compartmental modeling leads to the derivation of pharmacokinetically interpretable parameters that are based on actual measurements. This framework allows for evidence-based dose optimization and is applicable to more than 150 compounds in PK-DB, thus providing a significant advantage over simulation-dependent methodologies in translational pharmacometrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.