Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221534›Full record

ArticleGlobal advances in integrative medicine and health

The Whole Person Health Index: A Self-Reported Tool to Assess Whole Person Health.

Mark H Pitcher, Helene M Langevin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global advances in integrative medicine and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark H PitcherNational Institutes of Health, National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7916-4689
Helene M LangevinOsher Center for Integrative Health, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3142-1671

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole Person Health is emerging as an important concept at the forefront of efforts to address the current "epidemic" of chronic disease in the US. Successfully tackling a research agenda on Whole Person Health and delivering actionable results requires a tool to (1) measure multiple outcomes related to Whole Person Health in an integrated manner, (2) assess whether an individual is moving toward or away from health by repeating the measurement over time, and (3) test interventions aimed at assisting individuals in moving toward better health. This Viewpoint article describes a new person-centered measure, the Whole Person Health Index (WPHI), derived from nine questions covering key elements of Whole Person Health. The nine questions are currently being administered in the cross-sectional National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the All of Us research cohort. Each question is rated on a 5 point scale (poor to excellent), and the WPHI can be calculated as the sum of scores such that an increase in WPHI over time represents improvement. The WPHI may be useful in research and surveillance as a measure of change in self-perceived health and health-related behaviors over time, and with individuals in clinical settings to promote greater engagement in self-care and achievement of personal health goals. The purpose of this Viewpoint communication is to make the research community aware of the opportunity to freely use the instrument questions.

Indexed as

health measurementself-assessmentwhole person health

Identifiers

PMID42221534
PMCPMC13219944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.