ArticleChemical science2026
A one-electron perspective on dative and ionic bonding.
Article in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The distinction between electron-sharing and dative bonding remains a matter of continued debate more than a century after Lewis's foundational contributions to chemical bonding. Here we show that part of the apparent dichotomy may arise from an overemphasis on electron pairs as the fundamental units of bonding. Using a combination of Generalized Valence Bond (GVB) theory, real-space descriptors (Laplacian of the electron density, delocalization indices, and IQA energy decomposition), electron distribution functions, and variational quantum Monte Carlo Born maxima, we find that many bonds traditionally considered either dative or ionic can be consistently interpreted within a peculiar single-electron bonding framework. In these interactions, one electron of the nominal bonding pair remains largely localized on one fragment, whereas its spin-paired companion delocalizes between fragments, providing a dominant contribution to bonding. We illustrate this motif in prototypical ionic, polar covalent, and donor-acceptor systems. While this perspective does not fully resolve the conceptual distinctions between dative and ionic bonding, it offers a coherent interpretation across different bonding regimes and suggests that the proposed kind of single-electron bonding may be rather common and chemically relevant.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.