Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221520›Full record

ArticleDigital health

The digital technology-well-being paradox: No link between digital use and life satisfaction in older adults.

Barbara Grintal, Peter Seljak, Jana Goriup, Voyko Kavcic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Barbara GrintalDepartment of Social Gerontology, Alma Mater Europaea University, Maribor, Slovenia.
Peter SeljakDepartment of Social Gerontology, Alma Mater Europaea University, Maribor, Slovenia.
Jana GoriupDepartment of Social Gerontology, Alma Mater Europaea University, Maribor, Slovenia.
Voyko KavcicDepartment of Social Gerontology, Alma Mater Europaea University, Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3874-3892

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The impact of digital technology use on older adults' well-being remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to investigate the independent association between information and communication technology (ICT) use and life satisfaction in older adults, while accounting for socioeconomic, health, and social covariates. Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional data from the 2025 DIGOLD survey of community-dwelling adults aged ≥60 years in Slovenia. Participants (N=983; mean age 72 years; 62% women) completed the Satisfaction With Life Scale and reported ICT use frequency (1=never to 5=daily). Covariates included age, gender, living arrangements, marital status, residence, education, household size, perceived economic situation, self-rated physical and mental health, and functional abilities. We computed Pearson correlations and fitted multiple linear regression models. Results: ICT use correlated positively with life satisfaction in bivariate analyses (r=0.25, p<.001). In the full multivariable model (adjusted R Discussion: Among older Slovenians, the simple positive link between ICT use and life satisfaction was fully explained by socioeconomic and health advantages among frequent users. Digital engagement alone may not raise life satisfaction without concurrent gains in health, financial security, or social connection. Digital inclusion initiatives should emphasize meaningful, socially connective uses of technology and be paired with supports that address mental and physical health and economic well-being.

Indexed as

digital literacydigital technology useinformation and communication technology (ICT)life satisfactionolder adults

Identifiers

PMID42221520
PMCPMC13219943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.