Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221500›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026

Toward relational biosecurity: understanding AI-enabled biology as a connected system.

Michelle Holko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michelle HolkoInternational Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are rapidly expanding what can be predicted and produced in biotechnology, transforming the life sciences into a computational, distributed, and increasingly design-oriented enterprise. At the same time, biosecurity frameworks remain largely organized around the control of known agents, materials, and individual technologies, creating a growing mismatch between emerging capability and current approaches to risk. In AI-enabled biology, capability is increasingly compositional, arising from interactions among data, models, infrastructure, and workflows. Risk no longer resides solely within individual components, but in how they are connected. Safeguards that are effective in isolation may fail when systems are integrated; for example, nucleic acid sequence screening may not capture risks arising from generative systems that explore novel biological space beyond reference frameworks. This Perspective argues for a relational approach to biosecurity that treats interactions between components as explicit objects of design and governance, rather than implicit byproducts of integration. It emphasizes system-level sensing, preservation of context and uncertainty, buffering of perturbations, and alignment with shared values across distributed actors. Rather than replacing existing safeguards, this approach extends them by addressing how they interact within workflows. It introduces the need to represent, measure, and propagate system-level objectives across components, enabling more coherent oversight of compositional workflows. While grounded in biological applications, these challenges extend to AI safety and governance more broadly, where risks emerge from interactions among systems rather than individual models.

Indexed as

AI-enabled biologyAI safetybiosecuritycompositional riskcyberbiosecurityhuman-in-the-loopsocio-technical systemssystems governance

Identifiers

PMID42221500
PMCPMC13215773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.