Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221414›Full record

ArticleAACE endocrinology and diabetes

Assessing Primary Aldosteronism Screening Implementation and Interpretation in an Outpatient Internal Medicine Clinic: A Cohort Study.

Rachel B Allen, Thomas Hui, Shelby Tungate Lopez, Anne M Komé, Anita Yang, Lindsay Zink, Luis Borges Espinosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AACE endocrinology and diabetes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rachel B AllenDepartment of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Thomas HuiUniversity of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Shelby Tungate LopezDepartment of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Anne M KoméDepartment of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Anita YangDepartment of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Lindsay ZinkDepartment of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina Medical Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Luis Borges EspinosaDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Objective: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk and accounts for up to 30% of resistant hypertension cases, but less than 2% of true PA cases are diagnosed. The aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR) is the most common screening tool but is often misinterpreted due to failure to assess aldosterone and renin separately. Appropriate screening should be conducted off mineralocorticoid antagonists and serum potassium should be within normal limits on the day of testing. The aim of this study was to determine rates of appropriate PA screening and management in primary care. Methods: Adults newly established between 2021 and 2024 with indications for PA screening including resistant hypertension, hypertension on ≥4 medications or 3 medications with blood pressure > 130/80 mmHg, or hypertension with atrial fibrillation, adrenal adenoma, or hypokalemia were included. We assessed whether patients underwent renin and aldosterone testing, if testing occurred under appropriate conditions, and whether results were interpreted correctly. Results: A total of 312 patients were indicated for PA screening primarily due to being on 3 antihypertensives with uncontrolled blood pressure (35.3%) or ≥4 antihypertensives (42.9%). Twelve patients (3.8%) were screened for PA, and 5 (41.7%) of those patients were screened appropriately. All screenings were interpreted as negative, yet 4 patients had true positive results. This study was limited to new patient encounters within a single internal medicine clinic and only followed patients for up to 12 months. Conclusion: PA remains underdiagnosed and mismanaged in primary care. Findings highlight the need for better provider education, awareness, and standardized protocols to improve detection and treatment for PA.

Indexed as

hyperaldosteronismprimary aldosteronismresistant hypertension

Identifiers

PMID42221414
PMCPMC13221945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.