ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Cardiac abnormalities in a young athlete with severe pectus excavatum: a case report of a diagnostic loop between anatomical distortion and cardiomyopathy.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pectus excavatum (PEX) is the most common congenital chest wall deformity, occasionally associated with cardiac displacement and mild functional impairment. Its role in masking or mimicking cardiomyopathy remains poorly defined, particularly in athletes. Case summary: We report the case of a 24-year-old asymptomatic male athlete with severe PEX, frequent monomorphic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), and mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Despite successful PVC ablation and absence of genetic mutations, fibrosis, or structural abnormalities on cardiac magnetic resonance and electroanatomic mapping, the patient maintained borderline LV dysfunction. These findings raised the possibility of either a mild non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathy (NDLVC) or a reversible functional impairment due to chest wall distortion. Based on Italian guidelines, the patient was deemed ineligible for competitive sports. However, we explored how this case might be handled in other European countries with more permissive or flexible criteria. Discussion: This case underscores the diagnostic uncertainty posed by overlapping anatomical and functional findings, and the potentially profound impact of disqualification from sport on young athletes. It also reveals discrepancies in national approaches to eligibility and the interpretation of borderline findings. The case prompts reflection on the need for more harmonized guidelines and, in selected cases, structured shared decision-making processes involving expert centres and the athlete. Conclusion: In the evolving context of NDLVC, this case highlights the difficulty of acting in rigid frameworks and diagnostic loops, advocating instead for individualized, responsible decision-making that balances safety with athlete well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.