ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
A hierarchical machine learning model for predicting self-harm and suicidal behaviour in hospitalised patients with schizophrenia using clinical history and nursing observations.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a two-layered machine learning framework that combines admission clinical information with longitudinal nursing observations to identify schizophrenia inpatients at high risk of self-harm or suicidal acts. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 477 patients with schizophrenia hospitalised in Liaoning Province between July 2021 and July 2024. According to whether at least one self-injurious or suicidal episode was documented during the index admission, 159 individuals were assigned to a high-risk group and 318 to a non-high-risk group. At admission, 18 baseline variables (including age, sex, history of self-harm, hopelessness/depression, and educational attainment) were extracted from electronic medical records, and 39 nurse-rated behavioural items were scored weekly using the Psychiatric Patient Nursing Observation Scale. Static and dynamic feature sets were used to train six classifiers [regularized logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), extreme gradient boosting, random forest, multi-layer perceptron, and K-nearest neighbours]. The best static model (regularized LR) and the best dynamic model (SVM) were combined through probability-level weighted fusion to generate a hierarchical risk score. Results: Multivariable analysis of admission features showed that previous self-harm [odds ratio (OR) = 4.323], hopelessness/depression (OR = 3.090), younger age (OR = 0.938), and higher educational level (OR = 1.357) were independent predictors of self-harm/suicidal behaviour. Among dynamic indicators, negative self-evaluation (OR = 2.303), self-reported depression (OR = 1.812), insomnia (OR = 1.768), talking to oneself (OR = 1.733), crying (OR = 1.700), and reduced conversation with others (OR = 1.422) remained significant. The optimised static LR model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7564, and the dynamic SVM model reached an AUC of 0.8531. Their fusion further improved performance (AUC = 0.9048; sensitivity 0.8542; specificity 0.7789; accuracy 0.8042). This hierarchical model outperformed the best flat combined-feature model (SVM; AUC = 0.9022) in sensitivity (0.8542 vs. 0.6667), indicating a more clinically appropriate detection of high-risk patients. Conclusion: A hierarchical machine learning approach that integrates baseline clinical history with repeated nursing assessments can effectively flag schizophrenia inpatients at high risk for self-harm and suicidal behaviour, supporting timely and individualised preventive strategies in psychiatric wards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.