ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2026
Lumi-Guide: An Artificial-Intelligence-Driven Multimodal Framework for Optimizing Personalized Neoadjuvant Therapy Decision-Making in Luminal Breast Cancer.
Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy in luminal breast cancer remains challenging, hindering precise treatment decisions. Here, we present the Lumi-Guide system, a novel multimodal framework that integrates deep-learning-based MRI analysis with clinical and genomic data to enable personalized treatment selection. In this multicenter study, we analyzed 1,097 patients with luminal breast cancer from 6 international datasets. We developed a Swin Transformer-based Lumi-I model using 3-plane dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data and integrated it with clinical factors to construct the Lumi-CI model, which demonstrated robust performance across the validation and 2 external test sets, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.810, 0.819, and 0.864, respectively. Radiogenomic analysis revealed distinct biological characteristics: The Lumi-I high-score group exhibited immunologically active and proliferative microenvironments, while the low-score group showed estrogen-response-driven signaling. To further enhance predictive accuracy, a genomic model (Lumi-G) based on 22 established RNA biomarkers was further developed and integrated with the Lumi-CI model to create a multimodal Lumi-CIG model. We subsequently designed a Lumi-Guide 2-step triage system that prioritizes clinical-imaging information (Lumi-CI) while selectively incorporating genomic data (Lumi-CIG) when beneficial, thus optimizing resource allocation. Critically, by integrating Lumi-Guide system prestratification with response-predictive-subtype-recommended therapies, patients predicted to achieve pCR demonstrated substantially higher actual pCR rates than controls across 3 treatment patterns: 77.8% vs. 61.5% (optimal treatment), 57.6% vs. 24.7% (non-optimal treatment), and 35.3% vs. 4.7% (double-negative response-predictive subtype). This clinically practical and biologically interpretable framework transforms personalized neoadjuvant therapy in luminal breast cancer into a scalable reality.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.