Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221299›Full record

ArticleResearch (Washington, D.C.)2026

Lumi-Guide: An Artificial-Intelligence-Driven Multimodal Framework for Optimizing Personalized Neoadjuvant Therapy Decision-Making in Luminal Breast Cancer.

Yanting Liang, Xiaobo Chen, Penghao Lai, Shaoxuan Huang, Minping Hong, Wenjing Jiang, Hongjie Cai, Yujie Ying, Kexin Chen, Kaiqi Hou and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Yanting LiangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xiaobo ChenDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Penghao LaiDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Shaoxuan HuangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Minping HongDepartment of Radiology, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Affiliated Jiaxing TCM Hospital, Jiaxing 314033, China.
Wenjing JiangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Hongjie CaiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yujie YingDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Kexin ChenDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Kaiqi HouDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yiying LiDepartment of Breast Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China.
Zhitao WeiDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Chinting WongDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Fan YangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Yuelong YangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Jie HouCancer Center, Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 310014, China.
Zaiyi LiuDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Xin ChenGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Image Analysis and Application, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Ying WangDepartment of Medical Ultrasonics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
Changhong LiangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Zhenwei ShiDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510080, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1305-5935

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy in luminal breast cancer remains challenging, hindering precise treatment decisions. Here, we present the Lumi-Guide system, a novel multimodal framework that integrates deep-learning-based MRI analysis with clinical and genomic data to enable personalized treatment selection. In this multicenter study, we analyzed 1,097 patients with luminal breast cancer from 6 international datasets. We developed a Swin Transformer-based Lumi-I model using 3-plane dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data and integrated it with clinical factors to construct the Lumi-CI model, which demonstrated robust performance across the validation and 2 external test sets, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.810, 0.819, and 0.864, respectively. Radiogenomic analysis revealed distinct biological characteristics: The Lumi-I high-score group exhibited immunologically active and proliferative microenvironments, while the low-score group showed estrogen-response-driven signaling. To further enhance predictive accuracy, a genomic model (Lumi-G) based on 22 established RNA biomarkers was further developed and integrated with the Lumi-CI model to create a multimodal Lumi-CIG model. We subsequently designed a Lumi-Guide 2-step triage system that prioritizes clinical-imaging information (Lumi-CI) while selectively incorporating genomic data (Lumi-CIG) when beneficial, thus optimizing resource allocation. Critically, by integrating Lumi-Guide system prestratification with response-predictive-subtype-recommended therapies, patients predicted to achieve pCR demonstrated substantially higher actual pCR rates than controls across 3 treatment patterns: 77.8% vs. 61.5% (optimal treatment), 57.6% vs. 24.7% (non-optimal treatment), and 35.3% vs. 4.7% (double-negative response-predictive subtype). This clinically practical and biologically interpretable framework transforms personalized neoadjuvant therapy in luminal breast cancer into a scalable reality.

Identifiers

PMID42221299
PMCPMC13220084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.