Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221277›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Retrospective Multicenter Review of Mastopexy Using the "Mushroom" Auto-augmentation Flap Technique.

Virginie Van Boeckel, Christophe Nizet, Jean-Luc Nizet, Xavier Nelissen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Virginie Van BoeckelFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Maxillofacial Surgery and Burn Center, University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Christophe NizetFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Maxillofacial Surgery and Burn Center, University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Jean-Luc NizetFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Maxillofacial Surgery and Burn Center, University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Xavier NelissenFrom the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Maxillofacial Surgery and Burn Center, University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Numerous procedures have been described to lift breast tissue and to improve aesthetic appearance of the upper pole through auto-augmentation mastopexy procedures, with a wide range of techniques. This study introduces a novel mastopexy procedure designed to optimize volume in the central and upper breast pole using a mushroom-shaped flap. Methods: This article presents a modified approach to fill the breast's upper pole using a median, deep-based pedicle flap. This is a retrospective, multicentered study, based on a series of cases conducted by the author. The perioperative management and the surgical technique are described. A systematic approach was used to identify acute and subacute complications during the postoperative follow-up period. Results: From January 2018 to December 2023, 198 women were included in the study and underwent mushroom mastopexy with or without implant and/or lipofilling. The mean age was 44.3 years (range, 18-74 y). The general complication rate was 13%, and we observed 1 hematoma that required reintervention. In 17 patients, local surgical revision was necessary due to hypertrophic scarring and nipple asymmetry. No nipple-areola complex necrosis was observed. Conclusions: Mushroom mastopexy lifts the breast while restoring maximum volume to the upper pole and can be combined with breast augmentation using implants or lipofilling. This technique is simple, reliable, and produces excellent aesthetic results with a low complication rate.

Identifiers

PMID42221277
PMCPMC13218766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.