ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2026
A prospective observational study to assess the compliance to enhanced recovery protocols among patients undergoing bone and soft tissue cancer surgeries and their postoperative outcomes.
Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocols are designed to maximize postoperative recovery and reduce complications. Despite extensive research on ERAS®, its implementation in bone and soft tissue surgeries is under investigated. The study aimed to assess the percentage compliance with individual components of the ERAS® pathway, determine the average overall compliance among patients, and compare postoperative complications across varying levels of compliance. In 300 patients with bone and soft tissue cancer surgeries from December 2021 to May 2023, we measured 20 ERAS® components for compliance including preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative items. We computed compliance percentages and postoperative results like postoperative length of stay, postoperative complications as per Clavien-Dindo (CD) class of complications, and readmission rates. The overall compliance rate with ERAS® protocols was 84.5% (81.8% in bone tumour groups and 82.2% in soft tissue groups). A significant correlation was observed between higher compliance and better outcomes. Patients with higher compliance had a shorter median hospitalstay of 7 days compared to 10 days for those with lower compliance (p < 0.001). Additionally, 70.3% of patients mobilized with limb physiotherapy within 24 h of surgery, and 98.7% received multimodal analgesia. Majority (81.7%) of the patients experienced minor complications (CD class I-II), and 5.6% experienced major complications (CD class III-V). Higher ERAS® compliance was associated with shorter hospital stays and fewer complications, suggesting its potential of better postoperative outcomes in bone and soft tissue cancer surgeries. Further studies stratifying patients by surgical complexity are needed to confirm these findings. Clinical Trial Registry Number: CTRI/2021/11/038241.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.