Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221273›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of surgical oncology2026

A prospective observational study to assess the compliance to enhanced recovery protocols among patients undergoing bone and soft tissue cancer surgeries and their postoperative outcomes.

Ashwini D Rane, Sohan Lal Solanki, Sagar Apte, Priya Bhatia, Jeson Rajan Doctor, Prakash Nayak, Ashish Gulia, Ajay Puri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ashwini D RaneDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Navi-Mumbai, India.
Sohan Lal SolankiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0003-4313-7659
Sagar ApteDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Priya BhatiaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Jeson Rajan DoctorDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Prakash NayakBone and Soft Tissue Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Ashish GuliaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, New Chandigarh, India.
Ajay PuriBone and Soft Tissue Services, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocols are designed to maximize postoperative recovery and reduce complications. Despite extensive research on ERAS®, its implementation in bone and soft tissue surgeries is under investigated. The study aimed to assess the percentage compliance with individual components of the ERAS® pathway, determine the average overall compliance among patients, and compare postoperative complications across varying levels of compliance. In 300 patients with bone and soft tissue cancer surgeries from December 2021 to May 2023, we measured 20 ERAS® components for compliance including preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative items. We computed compliance percentages and postoperative results like postoperative length of stay, postoperative complications as per Clavien-Dindo (CD) class of complications, and readmission rates. The overall compliance rate with ERAS® protocols was 84.5% (81.8% in bone tumour groups and 82.2% in soft tissue groups). A significant correlation was observed between higher compliance and better outcomes. Patients with higher compliance had a shorter median hospitalstay of 7 days compared to 10 days for those with lower compliance (p < 0.001). Additionally, 70.3% of patients mobilized with limb physiotherapy within 24 h of surgery, and 98.7% received multimodal analgesia. Majority (81.7%) of the patients experienced minor complications (CD class I-II), and 5.6% experienced major complications (CD class III-V). Higher ERAS® compliance was associated with shorter hospital stays and fewer complications, suggesting its potential of better postoperative outcomes in bone and soft tissue cancer surgeries. Further studies stratifying patients by surgical complexity are needed to confirm these findings. Clinical Trial Registry Number: CTRI/2021/11/038241.

Indexed as

Bone and Soft TissueCancer SurgeriesComplianceEnhanced Recovery after SurgeryPost-operative Outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42221273
PMCPMC13216435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.