ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2026
Navigating the Surgeon-Industry Relationship: Opportunities, Risks, and Ethical Boundaries.
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The relationship between surgeons and the medical industry is a complex and multifaceted one that has played a pivotal role in advancing surgical care. The surgeon-industry nexus, while potentially beneficial, also presents ethical dilemmas and the risk of misuse, making it a topic of considerable debate within the medical community. Through this narrative review, we aim to examine existing literature to evaluate whether this relationship ultimately serves the public good or poses challenges to ethical medical practice. Methods: A PubMed search for Surgeon Industry relationship revealed 387 articles that had been published in the past 20 years, out of which we chose 26 relevant articles for this narrative review. Results: Historically, the relationship between surgeons and the medical device industry began as informal partnerships, primarily centred around refining surgical tools based on firsthand operating room experiences. By the twentieth century, these collaborations evolved into more formalized interactions as the complexity of medical advancements necessitated deeper cooperation. Industry collaborations have allowed for the development of ground-breaking technologies such as arthroscopic ACL reconstruction, implant technologies, and the integration of robotics into surgery, to mention a few of them. Despite these benefits, conflicts of interest may arise when financial incentives offered by the industry influence clinical decision-making. Regulation, which may be self or state is the key to keeping this relationship in check. Conclusion: While the collaboration between surgeons and the medical industry has the potential to revolutionise healthcare, both parties must engage with integrity, transparency, and a firm commitment to ethical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.