Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221158›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

Patient and clinician perceptions, expectations, and usability of ankle exoskeletons for daily living: a mixed-methods survey study.

Daniel Gomez-Vargas, Vanessa Uchenna, Manon Bocahut, Flavio Roberti, Ricardo Carelli, Marcela Munera, Carlos A Cifuentes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daniel Gomez-VargasInstitute of Automatics, National University of San Juan, San Juan, Argentina.
Vanessa UchennaBristol Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Manon BocahutGraduate School of Engineering, EPF-Engineering School (EPF), Cachan, France.
Flavio RobertiInstitute of Automatics, National University of San Juan, San Juan, Argentina.
Ricardo CarelliInstitute of Automatics, National University of San Juan, San Juan, Argentina.
Marcela MuneraBristol Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Carlos A CifuentesBristol Robotics Laboratory, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ankle exoskeletons offer promising support for individuals with chronic foot drop, yet user and clinician perspectives on their use in daily living remain underexplored. Related studies on lower limb exoskeletons have typically assessed user perceptions following direct physical interaction with devices, which may influence feedback and its interpretation. In contrast, this study aimed to assess perceptions, expectations, and usability through a convergent mixed-methods approach involving 43 participants (i.e., 27 patients diagnosed with foot drop and 16 clinicians), without requiring hands-on experience. Participants completed a pre-exposure Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) survey, viewed educational videos on ankle exoskeleton technology, and subsequently completed a follow-up survey assessing expectations, potential daily applications, and usability using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Quantitative analysis revealed that 70.4% of patients were initially unaware of exoskeletons, and 81.5% reported no understanding of how they function. Clinicians demonstrated significantly higher knowledge scores than patients (

Indexed as

activities of daily life (ADL)ankle exoskeletonKAPperceptionsurveySUSusability

Identifiers

PMID42221158
PMCPMC13216185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.