Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221119›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Application of machine learning models for predicting risk factors of acute exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Dapeng Kuang, Jie Min, Huibiao Deng, Yajun Zhao, Yangyang Sun, Jiang Hong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dapeng Kuang *Department of Emergency and Critical Care, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jie Min *Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, Shanghai Pudong New Area Mental Health Center, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Huibiao DengDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yajun ZhaoDepartment of Health Management Centre, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yangyang SunHenan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jiang HongDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic respiratory disease characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms and progressive airflow limitation. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) are significant causes of hospitalization and death among COPD patients. This study aims to identify risk factors for AECOPD exacerbations and develop a highly accurate and interpretable predictive model using various statistical and machine learning methods. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 2,102 COPD patients admitted between 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2024. The primary outcome was AECOPD severity, defined as the need for treatment escalation. Initial feature selection was performed using LASSO regression to identify potential risk factors. To validate the model's effectiveness and explore its superior predictive performance, the dataset was partitioned by time period and proportion: The first 70% of observations in chronological order were used as the training set, with the remaining 30% as the test set. Multiple machine learning algorithms were then employed for model construction and comparison. To enhance model interpretability, we utilized SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to illustrate the contribution of each variable to the prediction outcomes. Results: Among the six machine learning models, the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model demonstrated the optimal predictive performance, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.960 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.940-0.980) in the training set and 0.824 (95% CI: 0.804-0.844) in the test set. In the test set, the evaluation metrics were as follows: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 0.805, 0.65, 0.872, 0.669, and 0.859, respectively. SHAP analysis revealed that creatinine (CREA), neutrophil percentage (NEU%), D-dimer, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), white blood cell count (WBC), and hypertension (HTN) were important factors influencing the model output. Conclusion: The XGBoost model developed in this study demonstrates robust performance in predicting AECOPD risk using routinely collected clinical and laboratory data. The integration of SHAP analysis enhances model transparency, supporting its potential utility in clinical risk stratification and early intervention.

Indexed as

acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD)chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)machine learningrisk factorsXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42221119
PMCPMC13216505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.