Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42221017›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026

Development of a Predictive Model for Identifying High-Risk Older Adults for Geriatric Emergency Department Screening.

Karen A Hauser, Jeremy Swartzberg, David Schlessinger, Nasrin Samady, Karin Dove, Michelle Donnelly, Cristina D Perkins, Dana Sax, Marlena Tang, Vincent X Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Karen A HauserDepartment of Hospital Medicine, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA.
Jeremy SwartzbergDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, California, USA.
David SchlessingerDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, California, USA.
Nasrin SamadyKaiser Permanente, Oakland, California, USA.
Karin DoveKaiser Permanente, Oakland, California, USA.
Michelle DonnellyKaiser Permanente, Pleasanton, California, USA.
Cristina D PerkinsKaiser Permanente, Pleasanton, California, USA.
Dana SaxDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kaiser Permanente Oakland Medical Center, Oakland, California, USA.
Marlena TangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco, San Franicsco, California, USA.
Vincent X LiuDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Pleasanton, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Geriatric emergency department (GED) programs face challenges in risk-stratifying older adults. Existing tools, like the identification of seniors at risk (ISAR) score model, have modest predictive accuracy and are difficult to implement sustainably. We undertook a quality improvement initiative to develop, evaluate, and validate a screening score (SS) within a large, integrated health care system. This score, which can be deployed and automated at emergency department (ED) triage, identifies older adults at risk of subsequent ED or hospital use and short-term mortality. Methods: The GED-SS score model was developed from a multicenter cohort of ED patients aged ≥70 years with an Emergency Severity Index > 1 from January 1, 2018, until December 31, 2019. The composite outcome was ≥3 days of acute care (ED, observation, or inpatient) or death within 90 days. The GED-SS score model was prospectively validated in 1313 ED patients and then compared with the nurse-performed ISAR score screenings. Results: The GED-SS score model showed better discrimination with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.73 vs 0.66 for the ISAR score model identification. At a 43% sensitivity threshold (based on an ISAR score model cutoff value of ≥ 3), the GED-SS score model had higher specificity (86% vs 78%) and positive predictive value (59% vs 47%), while also flagging fewer patients (23.3% vs 29.1%). Conclusion: We developed and validated a GED-SS score model to identify older adult ED patients at increased risk of short-term mortality and acute care utilization. The model, which uses structured data facilitating automatic calculation, was prospectively validated and performed comparably to or better than the ISAR score model.

Indexed as

geriatric emergency departmentgeriatric emergency department screeninghigh-risk geriatric patientsscreening model

Identifiers

PMID42221017
PMCPMC13217493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.