ArticleJHLT open2026
Comparison of donor-derived cell-free DNA fractions between combined heart-lung vs isolated heart or lung transplant recipients.
Article in JHLT open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a validated marker of graft injury following isolated heart or lung transplantation. However, no such studies exist for heart-lung transplant (HLTx) recipients. Methods: HLTx recipients at a single center were screened for enrollment between August 2022 and September 2024. Heart transplant (HTx) and lung transplant (LTx) recipients from the same center served as comparison groups. Plasma dd-cfDNA samples were collected before surveillance bronchoscopies and clinically indicated evaluation for graft dysfunction during the first-year post-transplant. Stable patients demonstrated no evidence of rejection, infection, or injury at any time. Pulmonary function test results (PFTs) were monitored and compared. Results: In total, 92 HTx, 39 LTx, and 10 HLTx recipients were enrolled. The HLTx cohort had a significantly different dd-cfDNA profile compared to LTx and HTx (median dd-cfDNA in HLTx: 0.14, LTx: 0.34, and HTx: 0.06, Conclusions: This study indicates that dd-cfDNA could be a useful tool for monitoring allograft health following HLTx, though sample size was limited. Further research is underway to elucidate the mechanisms that account for these findings and to establish thresholds for detecting graft injury in this distinct cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.