Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42220928›Full record

ArticleBasic and clinical neuroscience2025

Chilling and Blurring Negative Memories: An Experimental Memory Training Study.

Fatemeh Azar, Tara Rezapour, Hossein Karsazi, Javad Hatami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Basic and clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fatemeh AzarDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5624-0001
Tara RezapourDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Institute for Cognitive Science Studies (ICSS), Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8073-7648
Hossein KarsaziDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-7761
Javad HatamiDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6036-1487

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The present study examined the extent to which broadening attentional scope (BAS) during acquisition and working memory interference (WMI) during reconsolidation could influence the memory formation process. Methods: A total of 95 participants were randomly assigned to inactive control (n=30), BAS (n=33), and WMI (n=32) groups. While watching a traumatic film, the participants in the BAS group were instructed to allocate their attention to the peripheral details of the film. In contrast, participants in the WMI group performed certain spatial working memory tasks. Memory vividness and emotionality were assessed before and after the intervention using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Valence, arousal, and dominance were measured by the self-assessment manikin (SAM) immediately after watching the film. Moreover, all participants were asked to record their intrusive memories for 3 days after the experiment. Statistical software package SPSS, version 24.0 was used for group comparisons. Results: Our results suggested that interfering with visuospatial working memory during the retrieval of emotionally valenced memories could significantly reduce the level of vividness of mental images from pre- to post-assessments (P=0.004). However, in terms of emotionality, arousal, dominance, and the number of intrusive memories, we found no significant differences between the three groups. Conclusion: Participants in the WMI group outperformed those in the control group in blurring the negatively valenced memory at the post-assessment. In contrast to our primary assumption, BAS did not result in any significant changes compared to the other two groups. Future studies with larger sample sizes and objective measurements may provide additional evidence on the efficacy of these methods, particularly in the context of clinical implications.

Indexed as

Broadening attentional scope (BAS)Emotional memoryVividnessWorking memory interference (WMI)

Identifiers

PMID42220928
PMCPMC13220683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.