Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42220925›Full record

ArticleBasic and clinical neuroscience2025

A Report of Lumbar Disk Herniation Treatment Outcomes: Percutaneous Laser Disk Decompression vs Open Microdiscectomy.

Masoud Khadivi, Ali Ahmadzadeh Amiri, Navid Moghadam, Amir Ahmadzadeh Amiri, Mohammad Eslamian, Mohammad Zarei, Mersad Moosavi, Milad Shafizadeh, Alireza Borghei, Ramin Kordi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Basic and clinical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Masoud KhadiviDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7491-4580
Ali Ahmadzadeh AmiriSports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5605-3521
Navid MoghadamSports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3316-8195
Amir Ahmadzadeh AmiriSports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5560-3472
Mohammad EslamianDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9349-4975
Mohammad ZareiDepartment of Orthopedics, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1495-7033
Mersad MoosaviSports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8695-2525
Milad ShafizadehDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9520-2099
Alireza BorgheiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Unites States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0083-8626
Ramin KordiSports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0116-3018
Mohsen RostamiSports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1296-9751

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Lumbar disk herniation (LDH) is one of the most common pathologies leading to radiculopathy. Open microdiscectomy is the gold standard of LDH treatment. However, minimally invasive techniques such as percutaneous laser disk decompression (PLDD) are gaining growing attention. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent PLDD and compared them with those of a group of patients who underwent open microdiscectomy. Methods: Our report included patients diagnosed with protruded LDH with severe refractory pain for at least 6 to 8 weeks who underwent the interventions. Baseline outcome parameters were recorded before the procedures, and questionnaires were completed at two follow-up sessions. Pain intensity was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS). Additionally, patients were asked to complete the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) to report their quality of life. Finally, we used the Oswestry disability index (ODI) to obtain information about patients' daily functional status. Results: A total of 165 patients were enrolled in the study. At the final follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference in the VAS level between the groups. However, the differences between the two groups regarding the SF-36 and ODI were statistically significant. Conclusion: Our study report showed that both methods significantly improved the clinical outcomes of the patients with protruded disk herniation.

Indexed as

Disk pathologiesLumbar spineMicrodiscectomyPercutaneous laser disk decompression (PLDD)Protruded lumbar disk herniation

Identifiers

PMID42220925
PMCPMC13220682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.