ArticleCase reports in pediatrics2026
Paraspinal Extrarenal Wilms Tumor Case Report and Review of Literature.
Article in Case reports in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Paraspinal Extrarenal Wilms Tumor Case Report and Review of Literature.Case reports in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Extrarenal Wilms tumors (ERWTs) (i.e., nephroblastoma) are exceptionally rare tumors that have only been reported approximately 100 times in the literature. These tumors necessitate histology (rather than imaging) for proper identification, often resulting in a postoperative diagnosis. Case Presentation: At 20 weeks of gestation, a female fetus was diagnosed with a subcutaneous lumbosacral mass by prenatal ultrasound (US). Days after birth, the mass was resected and pathologically determined to be an ERWT. Specifically, the excised mass had a triphasic histologic pattern, including blastemal, stromal, and primitive epithelial components. Centrally, the lesion demonstrated cystic and pseudopapillary architectural features, while peripherally, the lesion was more solid with the morphologic appearance of Wilms tumor (WT). This case is unique due to (1) the unusual lumbosacral location, (2) the presence of normal bilateral kidneys on US, and (3) the detection of the mass on in utero imaging studies. Literature Review: Including our report, ERWT has been reported 16 times in the (para)spinal/vertebral region and range from T9 to the coccyx. Most patients initially receive surgery (gross total resection, if feasible) followed by chemotherapy (vincristine and dactinomycin) and radiation depending on final pathology and additional case considerations. Discussion: Due to the rarity of ERWTs, there is no standardized treatment. Complete excision with adjuvant chemotherapy (vincristine and dactinomycin) is most often suggested as a best/most appropriate approach to treatment, with the addition of radiotherapy for recurrence and/or metastasis. Conclusion: This case report and literature review highlights the necessity of considering ERWT as a potential diagnosis when faced with a patient who has a lumbosacral paraspinal/spinal mass, even if other clinicoradiographic features typical of WT are not identified. We also call to light the need for a standardized treatment regimen for ERWT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.