ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Brain signature of food and alcohol stimuli processing: a comparative EEG study.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Food and alcohol cues are potent motivational stimuli that engage neural systems supporting reward and approach-avoidance behavior. While EEG studies have largely emphasized event-related potentials, less is known about how sustained oscillatory dynamics differentiate appetitive cues with distinct biological and learned significance. Methods: EEG activity was recorded in healthy adults during passive viewing of food-related, alcohol-related, and matched neutral images using a paradigm optimized for prolonged exposure. Spectral power was analyzed across canonical frequency bands with cluster-based permutation statistics. Individual differences in alcohol use were assessed using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Additional psychometric assessments included measures of depression (BDI-II), trait anxiety (STAI-Trait), eating behavior (DEBQ), and nicotine dependence (Fagerström). Results: Food and alcohol cues elicited dissociable oscillatory responses. Food images were associated with increased delta-band power over posterior and central regions, whereas alcohol images induced decreased delta power and increased alpha-band activity over parieto-occipital areas. These effects were most pronounced in individuals with higher AUDIT scores, while lower-AUDIT scorers showed no consistent oscillatory modulation. Psychometric scores indicated non-clinical levels of depression and anxiety across participants. Conclusion: The findings indicate that food and alcohol cues engage partially distinct oscillatory dynamics during passive viewing. EEG spectral measures capture sustained, state-dependent aspects of motivational processing, highlighting differences between biologically grounded and learned reward cues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.