ReviewCureus2026
Rehabilitation in ICU-Acquired Weakness: An Evidence-Based Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromuscular weakness due to critical illness myopathy and polyneuropathy is a common and disabling complication of modern intensive care, contributing to prolonged ventilator dependence, delayed recovery, and persistent functional impairment among ICU survivors. With improving survival from critical illness - particularly in low- and middle-income countries - the burden of ICU-acquired weakness has increased, while rehabilitation practices remain heterogeneous and inconsistently implemented. This narrative review, developed in accordance with the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) criteria, synthesises contemporary evidence on rehabilitation strategies for ICU-acquired neuromuscular weakness using a structured, non-systematic search of major databases covering publications from January 1980 to January 2025. Current evidence suggests that structured, multidisciplinary rehabilitation improves short-term muscle strength, mobility, and healthcare efficiency, although consistent benefits on mortality and long-term quality of life have not been demonstrated. Early active mobilisation increases activity levels and attainment of functional milestones but requires individualisation to ensure safety and effectiveness. Adjunctive modalities such as neuromuscular electrical stimulation and inspiratory muscle training show benefit in selected patients, particularly when integrated with conventional physiotherapy, whereas passive interventions predominantly appear insufficient when used in isolation. Diagnostic and prognostic assessment should prioritise early identification of clinically relevant weakness to enable timely rehabilitation rather than exhaustive neuromuscular classification. This review integrates key pathophysiological mechanisms, pragmatic diagnostic approaches, evidence-based rehabilitation modalities, and real-world barriers to implementation. Rehabilitation in ICU-acquired neuromuscular weakness should be regarded as a core therapeutic intervention - initiated early when feasible, titrated to illness severity, and integrated across the ICU-to-recovery continuum - to optimise outcomes for survivors of critical illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.