ArticleCureus2026
Self-Esteem and Body Satisfaction After Radical Orchiectomy With or Without Testicular Prosthesis: A Retrospective Study at a Mexican Tertiary Center.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadical orchiectomy remains the standard treatment for localized testicular cancer. However, the resulting anatomical loss may negatively affect body image and self-esteem, especially in young men. The use of testicular prostheses has been proposed as a reconstructive option to mitigate these psychosocial effects, though evidence on its impact on global self-esteem remains limited, particularly in Latin American populations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, analytical study among adult patients with non-metastatic testicular cancer who underwent radical orchiectomy at a tertiary public hospital in Mexico between 2019 and 2024. Participants were categorized into two groups based on whether they received a testicular prosthesis. This retrospective study assessed psychosocial outcomes following radical orchiectomy, using telephone-administered Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale assessments and a study-specific, non-validated satisfaction questionnaire. Comparative analysis was performed using the Student's t-test, with p<0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Of 110 eligible patients, 92 completed follow-up surveys (41 with prosthesis, 51 without). Patients with prostheses had significantly higher self-esteem scores (mean 31.8 vs. 23.6; p = 0.003). Global satisfaction with the implant was 100%, and 96% of recipients would undergo the procedure again. Dissatisfaction was most commonly reported for implant position (29%) and consistency (51%). Conclusions: Immediate testicular prosthesis placement after orchiectomy may improve self-esteem and body satisfaction in testicular cancer survivors. These findings support the inclusion of prosthetic counseling as a routine component of surgical care, especially in health systems where reconstructive options are underutilized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.