Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42220826›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Beyond Analgesia: Preliminary Observations of Appetite and Weight Changes After Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Rafael J Sanchez-Dopazo, Joseph E Mouhanna, Natasha Mehta, Rockeven B Desir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rafael J Sanchez-DopazoPain Medicine, Larkin Community Hospital, Miami, USA.
Joseph E MouhannaPain Medicine, Larkin Community Hospital, Miami, USA.
Natasha MehtaPain Medicine, Larkin Community Hospital, Hialeah, USA.
Rockeven B DesirMedicine, Medical University of the Americas, Charlestown, KNA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established therapy for chronic pain, primarily used for analgesia; however, its broader physiologic effects remain poorly characterized. This retrospective observational cohort study evaluated whether SCS implantation was associated with changes in appetite and body weight in patients with chronic pain. Eighteen patients with permanent SCS implants (10 females, eight males; aged 43-75 years) were reviewed. Outcomes included weight loss, weight gain, or no change in weight, along with self-reported appetite changes following implantation. Weight loss was observed in six patients (33%), ranging from 6.8 to 22.6 kgs, all of whom reported decreased appetite. Two patients (11%) experienced weight gain, while 10 patients (56%) demonstrated no significant weight change. Overall, seven patients (39%) reported decreased appetite after SCS implantation; however, decreased appetite did not consistently translate into measurable weight loss. These findings suggest that SCS may influence appetite regulation in a subset of patients with chronic pain, potentially through central neuromodulatory mechanisms beyond analgesia. Larger prospective studies with standardized metabolic and weight assessments are needed to further evaluate this relationship and its clinical implications.

Indexed as

appetite changesappetite regulationchronic pain managementimplantable neurostimulation devicesneuromodulationneuropathic painpain medicine outcomesretrospective cohort studyspinal cord stimulation (scs)weight loss

Identifiers

PMID42220826
PMCPMC13222056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.