ArticleCureus2026
Prevalence of Anaerobic Bacteria in Surgical Site Infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) are important postoperative complications associated with prolonged hospitalization, increased antimicrobial exposure and higher healthcare costs. Anaerobic bacteria are recognized contributors to SSIs but are often underdetected in routine laboratory practice due to challenges in specimen collection, transport and culture. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of anaerobic bacteria in clinically suspected SSIs and to describe the distribution of anaerobic isolates in monomicrobial and polymicrobial infections. Methods A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Kanchipuram, India, from November 2024 to September 2025. A total of 72 postoperative patients with clinical suspicion of SSI were included. Appropriate wound specimens were processed for aerobic and anaerobic culture using standard microbiological methods. Anaerobic isolates were identified to the genus level by phenotypic disc-based and biochemical methods. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows Version 29.0 and summarized using descriptive statistics. Results Anaerobic organisms were recovered from 22/72 specimens (30.5%). Among anaerobic culture-positive cases, polymicrobial infection was more common than monomicrobial infection, occurring in 16/22 (72.7%) and 6/22 (27.3%) cases, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.