ArticleCureus2026
Awareness and Understanding of Post-intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Among Internal Medicine Residents in a Community Hospital Setting.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) includes cognitive, psychological, and physical impairments that may persist after critical illness. Prior studies have shown that more than half of ICU survivors develop new physical, mental, or cognitive problems after discharge, underscoring the substantial burden of post-ICU morbidity. Despite this, awareness among healthcare providers remains limited. Internal medicine residents frequently care for ICU survivors during hospitalization and after discharge, and limited awareness may delay recognition of post-ICU complications and contribute to gaps in continuity of care. Objective To assess awareness of PICS, knowledge of its clinical domains and management concepts, and self-reported confidence in managing post-ICU sequelae among internal medicine residents in a community hospital and identify educational gaps. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey of internal medicine residents at a community-based residency program from June to July 2023. The questionnaire assessed knowledge of PICS, familiarity with the Assess, prevent, and manage pain; Both spontaneous awakening trials and spontaneous breathing trials; Choice of analgesia and sedation; Delirium: assess, prevent, and manage; Early mobility and exercise; Family engagement and empowerment (ABCDEF) bundle, prior PICS education, and confidence in managing post-ICU sequelae. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses. Exploratory associations between prior PICS education and selected outcomes were assessed using Fisher's exact test, with odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and two-sided P values reported. Results Sixty-five of 75 residents responded (86.7%). Residents demonstrated substantial knowledge gaps regarding PICS, particularly in identifying affected populations, diagnostic tools, and familiarity with the ABCDEF bundle. Prior PICS education was significantly associated with greater familiarity with the ABCDEF bundle (OR, 11.47; 95% CI, 1.03-601.36; P = .023) and higher confidence in managing post-ICU sequelae (OR, 6.71; 95% CI, 1.71-33.17; P = .004), but not with other knowledge measures. These exploratory associations should be interpreted with caution, as the wide confidence intervals suggest limited precision and possible instability of some estimates. Conclusions Internal medicine residents demonstrated substantial knowledge gaps regarding PICS. Targeted educational strategies during residency may strengthen recognition and management of post-ICU complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.