ReviewJAACAP open2026
Umbrella Review: Mental Health Interventions for Autistic Children and Adolescents: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Participatory Equity Synthesis.
Review in JAACAP open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Autistic children and adolescents experience high rates of mental health conditions. Objectives were to summarize systematic review evidence and describe quantity and quality of evidence on interventions for the mental health of autistic children and adolescents, how systematic reviews categorize and synthesize intervention effectiveness, how equity-relevant characteristics are addressed, and implications of evidence on equity-relevant characteristics. Method: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases were searched from 2014 to 2024 to identify systematic reviews on mental health conditions in autistic children and adolescents. After screening of 4,027 records, 31 reviews were included. Data were extracted and assessed in terms of intervention effectiveness and in relation to equity-relevant characteristics. Participatory synthesis was guided by a research advisory group comprising people with lived experience of autism, whose perspectives were incorporated into multiple stages of the research process. Results: The intervention with the best evidence was cognitive-behavioral therapy, which was effective for all mental health outcomes covered. There was also weak evidence for mindfulness (for depression and anxiety), social skills training (for depression and anxiety) and pharmacological therapies (for anxiety, obsessions, and compulsions). Most reviews were rated as being of low or critically low quality. With few exceptions, reviews did not address equity dimensions of interventions in depth. Conclusion: Current evidence does not highlight the equity dimensions that impact the effectiveness of mental health interventions for autistic children and adolescents. Future work should take an intervention-wide, equity-deep approach to synthesis and to design and analysis of primary trials. Study registration information: Mental health interventions for autistic children and adolescents: overview of systematic reviews and participatory equity synthesis; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024612863.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.